Archive for category Manhattan Lawyers
Battle Creek Personal Injury Lawyers Auto accident News 643
Posted by Lawyer in Manhattan Lawyers on October 4, 2013
Battle Creek, MI people regularly rely on our firm to solve their legal problems – the Law Offices of Gary Bloom. A hard-working law office with honest Battle Creek, MI personal injury lawyer, attorney Bloom has a well-earned reputation for delivering results. Whether it’s auto accidents on I-94 or or elsewhere, Gary Bloom works with injury victims and gets them the compensation they rightfully deserve.
Your case deserves justice, about holding people accountable for their actions. That’s why it’s critical you have an attorney on your side you can trust who thoroughly understands the legal system. Looking for a accident lawyers Lansing Mi?
Our firm is prepared to handle any kind of car accident. We know how to investigate car accidents, where to look for evidence and how to use that information to build a rock-solid case. Our law firm may enlist the services of experts, including medical professionals or accident reconstruction specialists. Whatever it takes to make sure you get excellent representation for your accident case.
Law Offices Of Gary Bloom34905 E. Michigan Ave.
Wayne, MI 48184
Tel: 734-722-2100
You might think you don’t need lawyer. Your case might seem straightforward. The person who caused your injury might have admitted wrongdoing. Many so-called simple cases become complicated. People change their story and deny guilt. And even if they don’t, most insurance companies are focused only on one thing: paying people as little as possible. That’s why you need a lawyer.
Some injuries might seem minor at first. Over time, even seemingly minor injuries can develop into more serious, chronic and debilitating conditions. Some of the most common auto accident injuries include:
- Back and neck injuries
- Spinal cord injury
- Traumatic brain injury
- Broken bones
- Fractures
To learn more contact a straight talking lawyer.
Personal injury lawyers
Medical malpractice case in Maryland settles before negligent doctor testifies
Posted by Lawyer in Manhattan Lawyers on June 27, 2013
Doctors are supposed to provide competent care to patients; get informed consent before providing treatment; and avoid misdiagnosing patients or performing unnecessary and dangerous medical procedures. Unfortunately, one interventional cardiologist fell way short of fulfilling these obligations when the doctor allegedly put hundreds of unnecessary stents in patients between 2007 and 2009.
The cardiologist performing the unnecessary medical procedures worked at St. Joseph Medical Center in Maryland, which is owned by Catholic Health Initiatives. Our Personal Injury Attorney Baltimore know that more than 500 former patients had an unnecessary stent implanted and that many of those patients have come forward to sue the cardiologist and the medical center. Now, some of these cases recently settled, with the plaintiffs receiving a payout but the doctor not admitting fault.
According to Clinical Advisor, hundreds of patients have filed lawsuits against Catholic Health Initiatives and against the doctor who allegedly implanted unnecessary stints. Plaintiffs report that they are experiencing complications as a result of what the doctor did and they are seeking damages to compensate them for their losses.
Medical malpractice cases can be resolved either through a full court trial with a jury or judge reaching a verdict or through an out-of-court settlement wherein the injured patients get an agreed-upon amount of compensation and give up the right to pursue a lawsuit. Many plaintiffs who are suing the cardiologist and Catholic Health Initiatives made the choice to settle their claim, which is common in malpractice cases. Settlement allows plaintiffs a guaranteed payout without the expensive or uncertainty of a trial.
Clinical Advisor reports that there were 21 plaintiffs involved in the case that settled. The trial in which these plaintiffs were raising their accusations had already begun and had been going on for six weeks before the doctor settled the case. The settlement was proposed and agreed to before the defense put on its side of the case to try to prove that the doctor was not liable.
Cases can settle at any time before a jury or judge renders a verdict, which means that it is not uncommon for plaintiffs and defendants to continue negotiating a settlement after a case has moved into the trial stage. In this case, that is likely what occurred.
